A Chat with Dr. Stephen Skinner

Few figures have contributed as prolifically—and as impactfully—to the world of Western esotericism as Dr. Stephen Skinner. A scholar, author, translator and practicing magician, Skinner has spent more than five decades reviving and clarifying the practical dimensions of the magical arts. From his groundbreaking early work on The Complete Magician’s Tables to his pioneering translations of grimoires such as The Veritable Key of Solomon and The Ars Notoria, he has helped reintroduce authentic, operable magic into the hands of contemporary practitioners. With a background in classical languages, a deep understanding of the Hermetic tradition and an abiding respect for the efficacy of ritual, Stephen Skinner stands as a bridge between scholarship and lived magical practice. Join us as we explore his lifelong dedication to magical realism, the spirits who walk with him and the ever-evolving landscape of ceremonial magic in the modern age.

In your extensive research, what do you see as the core principles that unite most magickal traditions, whether they follow a formal ceremonial approach or a more intuitive path?

The need to announce, invoke or evoke out loud the objectives of the operation and what is required. The presence of spirits, Gods, etc., to answer those invocations.

Your work on classical grimoires has shed light on many ancient practices. How might someone new to magick begin exploring this rich tradition without feeling overwhelmed?

Maybe attempt divination by Tarot, Geomancy or I Ching, before attempting magick. Then start with a simple and easily verifiable request, to see that it is working.

For those starting out, how would you suggest balancing practical spell work aimed at results with practices that focus more on personal spiritual development?

In fact, those two things are quite different. Spell work is focussed on achievable results, mostly on the physical plane, whereas personal spiritual development is more allied to mysticism rather than to magick.

Many magickal traditions use ritual tools like the wand, chalice and knife. From your perspective, how important is the specific design or consecration of these tools for effective practice?

The making of tools ties the magick to the physical plane, which is where you wish to see changes. The actual design is not so important, provided it reflects the intention or desired outcome. The consecration of those tools is important as it ties the magical realms to the physical plane.

Creating sacred space is a common theme across spiritual practices. What, in your view, makes a space truly “sacred,” and how might a beginner approach this aspect of ritual?

A sacred space is essentially a location of purity and purity is important for the manifestation of spiritual presences.

Working with spirits can be daunting for beginners. What foundational practices would you recommend for someone interested in safely exploring spirit communication?

Keeping the boundaries clear and functional, just as the magical circle must be cleanly drawn with no breaks. The practices of incensing a space and consecrating a tool are important foundational practices, along with the memorisation of invocations and relevant poetry.

Planetary influences are central to many magickal systems. Are there particular planetary energies that you think are especially useful for those just beginning their practice?

It is important to understand the seven planetary energies, as they penetrate most of magick and are used extensively in time allocation and the categorisation of particular magical objectives.

Many modern practitioners adapt historical practices to fit contemporary lifestyles. How do you personally approach the balance between traditional authenticity and modern practicality?

I try to do as much as possible ‘by the book’ rather than attempting to simplify things for my own convenience. It is important when invoking to feel that the whole weight of tradition is behind you and the power of the words you are calling.

Some magicians focus on personal spiritual ascent (theurgy,) while others aim for tangible results (thaumaturgy.) How would you advise someone new to magick in choosing which path to emphasize, if either?

Try first for tangible results. Then you can clearly see if the method you are using is working or not. Spiritual ascent is not so easily measurable and you can fool yourself about your degree of ascent.

In many traditions, divine names hold significant power. How important is it for a beginner to understand the historical and cultural context of the names they might encounter in rituals?

It is sufficiently to understand their holiness and to treat them with the respect they deserve.

You’ve witnessed how Western magick has evolved over the years. Are there any recent trends or approaches that you find particularly promising for new practitioners?

The trend towards oversimplification should be avoided. Magick is serious and complicated and so should be treated as such.

Different traditions approach magickal ethics in varying ways. From your perspective, is there a common ethical framework that new magicians should consider adopting?

The ethics of the hero, where honesty and support of others is most important.

Astrological timing is emphasized in many classical texts. How critical do you think it is for modern magicians to observe planetary hours and alignments, especially when they’re just starting out?

Essential.
With so many books, online courses and forums available today, how can someone new to magick discern trustworthy sources of knowledge from less reliable ones?

One can only trust experience, yours or that of someone you trust.

Looking forward, how do you envision the future of magickal practice evolving? Are there any developments you hope to see in how magick is taught or practiced?

I would hope to see it evolve as a technology which clearly establishes specific provable methods for specific outcomes. There can of course be multiple methods, but then each should be tested and only retained if regularly proven effective.